This piece is part of our “Ask the Expert” series, in which experts share their insights into some of the most urgent questions for our Tech ecosystem. Register for your place in Santa Meyer-Nandis, the expert session after “How to Burn, not from” on June 20 at 3:30 p.m. at TNW2025.
In our work -whether sustainable management frameworks, advice on climate innovation funds or leadership of entrepreneurs -we always see the same silent barrier:
People burn out, even if their ideas are successful.
And it is not because they are unorganized or weak. Quite the opposite.
Sandro Gianella, head of the EMEA policy and partnerships, on stage at the TNW conference 2025
In the next KI wave of top Voices, listen to how the continent -can not only follow.
What we see is a highly functioning burnout. The founder who delivers and executes but cannot sleep. The political decision -maker, whose campaigns are technically successful, but whose nervous system is in survival mode. The sustainability leader who keeps transformation in an institution – without feeling yourself.
It often looks good from the outside. But it slowly undermines motivation, creativity and resilience qualities that are essential for long-term changes.
Burnout is not a personal failure. It is a system reaction
The World Health Organization recognizes burnout as a phenomenon in the workplace, which is associated with chronic, non -managed stress. According to a study in 2022, the Hartford stated 30% of the employees to be less busy with their work due to burnout, and 25% fought for concentration. Although these numbers are already worrying, they are probably underestimating the deeper burnout in fields such as sustainability, public service or system changes – where the operations are high and emotional stress is rarely named.
In fact, research in the Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine indicates the significant effects of mental health – associated absenteeism and presence on productivity at work. But in our experience, the costs are not only economical – they are relational, cultural and strategic. Burnout often changes the sheet of a project long before it becomes visible on paper.
Because these people don't just manage appointments.
You manage resistance. Complexity. Emotional work. Moral pressure. Whole during the pioneers – often without a card and often without colleagues who really understand the site.
We worked in meeting rooms and ministries. We have managed public funds and cross -sectoral partnerships. Again and again it is not the lack of good ideas or intelligent tools that limit the dynamics.
It is human architecture. It is whether the people involved are ground, seen and supported – both professionally and personally.
Why we are interested in the other side of change
I am an environmental attorney through training. My co -founder, Dr. Anna Katharina Meyer, worked on the energy transfer, climate finance and sustainability strategy. Together we spent years to shape the technical and financial architecture of change: regulation, investments, governance.
And yet we have seen again and again that projects do not stall because the ideas were not Sound – but Because the people who kept them were too exhausted to continue.
The largest invisible costs in systemic change are emotional and relational.
We saw how teams do not fall apart out of lack of passion – but because they lacked the space to recover and connect again. Not because it didn't matter – but because they took care of it alone.
For this reason, we have started to speak publicly about what we used to see as “side problems”: well -being, self -regulation and emotional sustainability.
Because they are not side problems at all.
What matters is not just the tools that people have – but whether the surroundings enable them to use them completely. We do not romanticize slowness. We professional resilience.
Teams that are regulated, connected and psychologically safe make better decisions.
This is not just a psychological insight. It is strategic.
Which decision -makers have to do now
If you finance, lead or design transformation systems, you will find four places where you have to start:
- Create security in the ambitions.
High performance and psychological security are not opposites. They are prerequisites for sustainable excellence. - Fund communities, not just projects.
The strategic orientation is not sufficient. People need the same age relationships and mutual recognition to stay in work long enough to be successful. - Value emotional sustainability.
Managers and teams that make heavy emotional workers need rooms in which they can get out of their roles and be human. This is not forgiving – it is intelligent. - Treat self -management and well -being as operational priorities.
Build rhythms for a break, reflection and restoration in your systems especially in high-pressure cycles.
Burn brightly, not out
The future is shaped by those who can keep complexity – and remain good. From managers who know that changes live not only in frameworks, but in culture. Of teams who understand that sustainable effects also require internal sustainability.
If we want to keep the transformation, we need structures that help people stay in the game long enough to really change them.
Comments are closed.