Large Stunning Invoice Replace: Senate sloppy by modifications

The senators agreed on changes and negotiated all night on Monday when Megabill of President Donald Trump had difficulty gaining enough support in the upper chamber, and the second -term domestic priorities of the president hung in balance.

In the early Tuesday morning, the Senate held 45 votes for about 24 hours and exceeded an earlier voice A-Rama record of 44 votes.

Trump's “a big, beautiful calculation” will soon be facing a decisive test in the Senate, after days of tense negotiations, the shift of the alliances and the 11th hour adjustments to the extensive package.

The Republican leadership on Tuesday morning was still working to shed the support of enough of its members to bring the megabill over the finish line and the house in front of a self -imposed period on July 4th.

Vice President JD Vance arrived in the US Capitol early Tuesday morning, usually a sign that a last vote in the Senate about the package could be nearby. An hour later there was still no indication of a possible time of a vote.

In view of the extremely tight majority of the Republican and GOP-Hold-Outs-Muss Vance, the binding votes for his conference may be available.

A final vote on the package can only take place until the legislator is made to introduce changes to the law, a process that has extended by almost 24 hours – and has not yet been completed.

Senators, mainly democrats, have introduced dozens of changes that aim at every aspect of the megabill, from Medicaid and Medicare to clean energy loans and other important provisions.

The Republicans have repeatedly rely on their close majority to defeat the Democrats to change the legislative template with changes.

While the vote on the amendments largely draws back into party skills, some over democratically guided revisions received republican support and vice versa.

Senator Ed Markay, Massachusetts, tried to remove the language from the draft law, which, as he put it, “would force rural hospitals to limit their services or actually close their doors” because they have Medicaid or Medicare. The Republicans Susan Collins from Maine and Lisa Murkowski from Alaska both crossed the gear and voted with Democrats for brandy change.

The US Senator Susan Collins (R-Me) speaks to Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) as Lori Chavez-Deremer, the candidate of the American President Trump, the secretary for labor ministers before a senate health, education, workforce (help) committee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, DC, American, on the 19th century).

Kent Nishimura | Reuters

Later on Monday, four democratic senators from Battlefield States – Sens. Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock by Georgia, Catherine Cortez Masto from Nevada and Maggie Hassan from New Hampshire – have all with republicans with republicans who are suitable for immigration of republicans, with certain crime, with The inscription of certain crime has been chosen with links that are suitable with a lawn.

Senators are allowed to introduce unlimited changes to a budget bill. Usually the proportion of changes introduced does not make it into the final invoice. But that's not always the point.

Changes are also often used to send a political message or to underline or support various senators against various parts of a large legislative package such as it.

For example, the Democrats hope to emit the Republicans to give individual votes for some of the controversial parts of the legislation, e.g. B. Changes to Medicaid and final tax credits for electric vehicles.

This recording of the support of a republican senator for a Lightning -Rod problem can be used by Democrats in attack ads if the next time Senator is for re -election.

Chuck Schumer, Chairman of the US Senate Mindfulness, speaks to reporters in the US Capitol, when the Republican legislature has difficulties, President Donald Trump's extensive expenditure and tax laws in Washington, DC, USA, June 30, 2025.

Kevin Lamarque | Reuters

In contrast, the Republicans partly use the change process to log their opposition to certain parts of the law, even if they ultimately plan to vote in favor of his passage.

When the majority leader of the Senate, John Thune, continued to try to complete enough voices, the White House continued to emphasize that the Republicans should be sent to Trump's desk by July 4.

Senate majority leader Senator John Thune (R-SD) (C) Together with Senator John Barrasso (R-WY) (L) and Sen. Mike Crapo (R-ID) (R) outside the White House on June 4, 2025.

Anna Moneymaker | Getty Images News | Getty pictures

“We need the full weight of the Republican conference to face this draft law, and we expect it and we are confident that you will do it,” said the press spokesman for the White House, Karoline Leavitt, at a briefing for reporter.

Trump also speaks regularly with the spokesman for House, Mike Johnson and Thune, about the bill, an official from the White House told CNBC.

The Press spokesman for the White House, Karoline Leavitt, will hold a press conference in the White House in Washington, DC, USA, on June 30, 2025.

Evelyn Hockstein | Reuters

Thune has a narrow majority with three seats, so that he can only afford to lose three votes in the last ballot and nevertheless pass the package with a vance voting department.

Sens. Thom Tillis by North Carolina and Rand Paul from Kentucky have already said that they were planning to vote against it.

Read more CNBC policy reporting

Senator Ron Johnson, R-WIS signaled for Thune.

Over the weekend, Johnson had voted to bring the legislative template for the final debate to the Senate. But only after he switched his first “no” stop to “yes” at the last minute.

Even if Thune is able to bring the calculation through his chamber this week, she still faces an uncertain way in the house, where the legislator has to approved the revisions made by the upper chamber.

Some Republicans of the house have already signaled objections to changes in the senate version of the legislation.

For his part, the Republican leadership of House asked its members to prepare for the votes on the package on Tuesday or Wednesday, a timeline that appears increasingly fleeting.

This is a developing story. Please check for updates.

Comments are closed.