Posted by Joe Bastardi
I see Willis referenced an idea that I posted on a blog from another source so I wanted to make sure WUWT is clear. The last person I want to argue with is Willis (or anyone else. I just observe but fourth ideas, and then in my work I do a forecast for people who are willing to look). You notice that I am a WUWT groupie. I rarely comment.
The. The “Go To” page for me on CO2 is the Keeling curve page. https://keelingcurve.ucsd.edu/ The 2 year chart (you have to click on it) shows some interesting things. Please excuse my lousy artwork, because not only am I a lousy writer, I also can’t draw to save my life. But you will get the point. (If you’re wondering how I can write books, it’s because I have a great editor and he gets paid a percentage that some other writers have told me like getting fight money. He is. He can translate bastard these , that is a level a little below pig Latin).
Now the blue line represents late winter, which flattens out CO2 as I was told, the maximum season for arctic sea ice. When the ice begins to melt, it turns back into CO2 until the foliage and fossil fuel shortage in the northern hemisphere break it down again. (This is one of the reasons I came up with the idea of getting rid of the carbon fear without crashing our economy. 1) Plant a trillion trees worldwide. That is where the pressure on other governments should be. It’s cheap and environmentally friendly. 2. Nuclear power. We have to get rid of the hangover “China Syndrome” (see film) caused by Jane Fonda. In fact, the only true China Syndrome is that China leads the world in actual air and ocean pollutant emissions. 3) carbon deposition. Anyway, back in the spring when Covid hit there was an insane rush to say the shutdown reduced pollutants. It was, true pollutants, of which CO2 is not one. PARTICULATE AND REAL POLLUTANTS HAVE BEEN REDUCED. But the CO2 flattening was like every year when you can blow up the jagged rise line you see on perennial graphs. My observation is that this has increased along with the rise in the SST, which is largely natural and cyclical (another argument for another time as there is much about the oceans that we do not know. I am a person on this matter by Bill Gray). My hypothesis was stated in the article when you read it, but I’ll rehash it here.
- The oceans are the largest carbon sink
- The warmer the oceans, the more CO2 is released.
- The oceans have warmed up.
- CO2 has increased.
Of course, on the other side of the argument, our “friends” want to argue about their CO2 that caused the warming, and frankly, I am open to that argument as long as the warming continues. I don’t believe it, but believing something and absolute knowledge are two different things.
I believe in gravity, so do you. That is belief and absolute knowledge. I also believe that the pattern we are in can lead to too much snow in the south and east and will create a major cold spell for a few weeks. But that is not absolute knowledge, and even if and when it occurs there will be arguments about it. The big difference I see in this debate on CO2 is that while I recognize that they have every right to try to blame if they choose to, the bulk of the people who do this are looking at nothing becomes what could challenge them. While there is a precedent for warming in the past that has little or nothing to do with CO2, but instead, as many of us believe, is largely natural. And that should tell you what the real conclusion is that all of our manual labor is not really about a scientific argument among people of good will, but about smoke protection for “other things”. (You can enter your own ideas)
But to be fair to Willis, he only looked at his table until November, if I read it correctly. Look again at the red lines (again this was in the article used as a nod to what was put on WUWT)
The slope from min to max in the last year before the end of late winter (as you can see, has increased significantly again) was significantly stronger than this year. We increased about 5ppm at this time last year, this year it’s about 3ppm. Now I think it’s because of the huge downturn in SST since last year at this point. Check this out, the difference in abnormalities.
But I wrote this because I’ve been pushing this idea since summer to pay attention to it, a natural cause, and knew full well that there would be arguments for bans due to the Covid-style climate (again, I do this in the article and in my book clearly, my thoughts on the subject)
And I can’t be right I see other arguments one must have so that the secret to having a chance of predicting the weather in a way that adds value is to make sure that the idea one is most skeptical about is your own. Then look for trouble and if you can counter it first, you have a chance. But I wanted to make sure that even if readers were wrong, they understood where I was from.
To quote Eric Burdon from Animals:
I am only a soul whose intentions are good
O Lord, please don’t let me be misunderstood.
4.7
3
be right
Item rating
Like this:
Loading…
Comments are closed.